Monday, January 27, 2014

What Have They Done for Us Lately?

Politicians in Tennessee would do well to look beyond the state’s borders for innovative actions they could emulate for the benefit of their constituents. State Senator Stacey Campfield, for example, could do more for his constituents than offer up a bill to permit guns in city and county parks. He could follow the example of the State of Utah, which has a goal of eliminating homelessness by 2015. Or, he could follow the lead of State Senators in Maine who introduced a bill permitting the importation of prescription drugs from licensed pharmacies in Canada.

Utah has achieved 75% of its goal by providing housing to the homeless. A body has to wonder, “Why would they do that?” Well, it turns out that it’s less expensive than covering the costs of emergency health care for some, and incarceration for others (which also includes health care). It means giving people the comfort and security of knowing they have a place to call home. From there, they can focus on improving their conditions. Apparently, Tennessee politicians never read or understood Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.  http://www.nationofchange.org/utah-ending-homelessness-giving-people-homes-1390056183?utm_content=buffer53f8f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer 

"How did Utah accomplish this? Simple. Utah solved homelessness by giving people homes. In 2005, Utah figured out that the annual cost of E.R. visits and jail stays for homeless people was about $16,670 per person, compared to $11,000 to provide each homeless person with an apartment and a social worker. So, the state began giving away apartments, with no strings attached. Each participant in Utah’s Housing First program also gets a caseworker to help them become self-sufficient, but they keep the apartment even if they fail. The program has been so successful that other states are hoping to achieve similar results with programs modeled on Utah’s."

"This happened in a Republican state! Republicans in Congress would probably have required the homeless to take a drug test before getting an apartment, denied apartments to homeless people with criminal records, and evicted those who failed to become self-sufficient after five years or so. But Utah’s results show that even conservative states can solve problems like homelessness with decidedly progressive solutions."

Maine’s Senators, Thomas (R) and Jackson (D) collaborated (that means worked together) to bring into existence a law that is saving cities like Portland hundreds of thousands of dollars, and corporations many times that.

"City employee Jeff Tardif signed his 7-year-old son up for the plan this year to get asthma meds. 

JEFF TARDIF:   My big thing is I'm saving money.  So, you know, it's 100 bucks that I'm saving monthly-- through this program.

RICK KARR:
Take the example of a three-month supply of the asthma drug Advair: Under the city’s regular health plan, at Portland pharmacies it costs a little under $600. The CanaRx plan imports it for a little over a $150 -- shipping included. With discounts like that, the city of Portland saves $200,000 a year on health care -- and there’s no copay for employees. Two years after the city launched its program, the largest employer in one of Maine’s poorest counties followed suit. Hardwood Products makes food sticks -- the wooden handles that go into popsicles, ice cream bars, corn dogs, and so on. Chief financial officer Scott Wellman says the family-owned company can do a lot with the $400,000 a year it saves on the plan.
SCOTT WELLMAN: That money can be used for employee raises.  That money can be used to offset the cost of their health care.  It also can be used to invest in equipment so we can produce new products.
Separate report highlights significant savings:
"But many state employees, as well as workers at the city of Portland and one large company, claimed they had saved some $10 million through Internet purchases over several years. For this reason, the bill had some backing from the business community and dissuaged the Republican governor from issuing a veto. Similarly, state and local governments may also save moneypastedGraphic.pdf. The state employee's union estimates savings of $6 to $10 million, according to Troy Jackson, the state senator who introduced the bill." http://www.drugs.com/news/maine-residents-can-now-import-foreign-pharmacies-45561.html


Of course, in both cases, it meant that politicians had to ask, “What can we do to improve the lives of our constituents. How can we fulfill the implied charge of all who serve in public office, to serve the needs of the people. If the citizens of Tennessee were to look closely at their elected officials, how many would be able to point to something they actually did that benefitted the state?

Don’t Stop There
Let's not limit ourselves to these two examples. Education is another area where truly caring officials could make a huge difference. Let's say they looked at the example of Indian casinos in North Carolina. They'd find that the community shared in the profits from the casino, initially to the tune of $6,000 per person (now, around $9,000). Children in the community became better students, with higher grades, fewer absences, less acting out in class. Other studies found the same results. It also demonstrated that parents had the financial freedom that gave them time to be better parents. All of this is consistent with research done under GW Bush.  That research looked at the variables that impact performance in school. The only variable that did correlate was poverty. Less poverty, better performance. 

There is so much that our politicians can do that would benefit our citizens, whatever age. They don't even have to come up with novel ideas. All they have to do is look at what others are doing.


Wednesday, January 8, 2014

The Many Forms of Poverty -- Geographic Poverty

Geographic Poverty

A rush came over me as I gathered my thoughts for this chapter. I realized that I had plenty of first-hand experience with the topic, though I had not given it a moment’s notice over the decades.

I grew up as a military brat, following my father from one location to another in Italy. I went to sixth and seventh grades in Naples, and the first two years of high school in Sigonella, Sicily. In both cases, we lived in the local communities, so my experiences were enhanced by making more friends within the city than I made at school on the base. That gave me a much broader view of things than I would have had if I had grown up solely in the US.

My understanding of geographic poverty came from retuning home to Cheshire, Connecticut from junior year in high school. Until then, money had not been an issue. Now, it was. Living again in the house I grew up in made the transition easier than it might have been. Familiarity with the town helped as well. 

Cheshire is a small bedroom community of above average wealth. Seventy plus percent of the residents were professionals -- doctors, lawyers, accountants, company executives and the like. My father, still working in Italy, was a GS-9 in the US Civil service. In effect, my mother was now a single head-of-household with three dependent children. 

There was much that I didn’t understand about that. Nor did I understand some facts of life. I look back on that as a blessing. We were latch key kids (ages 15,10, and 8) but sociologists had not yet coined the term. Our mother was for all intents and purposes single-head-of-household. We were poor but we didn’t know it. We were often broke. Mom’s job at a retailer paid a commanding $1.10/hr. After paying taxes and $2/day for taxi fare, she raised three children on $5/day. Even in 1960, that was a far cry from the $5/day Henry Ford paid his workers in 1914 (equivalent to $3.23 in 1960, $25.26 in 2013).

There’s an important distinction between poor and broke, best expressed by the comedian/activist Dick Gregory, in his autobiography, NIGGER, published in 1964. He expressed it this way (I paraphrase): We were never poor but we were always broke. Broke is a temporary condition. Today you have money, tomorrow you don’t. If you're poor, you're poor all your life.

That’s how it was with us. I remember being broke on graduation day. An announcer told the gathering of proud parents that photos of the class of ’63 would be available for the low price of $1.75 each. Between myself, my mother and my older brother, we couldn’t muster the cash. The following day, when my fellow grads were at the beach, I was at work full time at a farmers’ exchange.

Geographic poverty in our case was a blessing. We were broke in a rich town. In spite of the cash flow issues, my siblings and I attended first rate schools, where academics held sway. The buildings were well maintained and safety was not an issue.

I never gave it much thought until tonight, but things could have been different. We might have lived in one of the adjacent communities, like Meriden or Waterbury, two blue-collar towns slowly fading into oblivion. Meriden for decades was known as the Silver City, the home of International Silver and a number of smaller silversmiths. By the 1960s, most of the manufacturing had moved away. Waterbury was known for its brass mills and foundries. Today, it’s major industry is healthcare. Both cities were edgier and families had markedly different views on education than Cheshire.

Cheshire was always seen as the rich town by residents of surrounding communities. For example, I remember meeting a young man about my age in a coffee shop in Meriden one Saturday. He told me his father was taking the family out for a treat that night -- pizza at an Italian restaurant --  in Cheshire. Meriden had plenty of good pizzerias scattered around town but this was different. They were going upscale.

I cannot overemphasize our good luck. To put it into perspective, and selfishly to make my point, I include below the most recent rankings of selected Connecticut school systems. Note that the scores of students in Cheshire are significantly better than those of Waterbury and Meriden. Those two cities are virtually light years ahead of the impoverished cities of Bridgeport and New Haven (the home of Yale University). The very exclusive city of Fairfield  (median household income $114.000) has excellent scores, in line with Cheshire. It abuts Bridgeport (median household income $40.000)  yet has nothing in common with it.

When I settled into a real job after a tour of duty in the US Navy, I sold industrial chemicals in southeast Michigan for a Connecticut-based company with a branch office in Ferndale, just a mile outside the Detroit city limits. Over the course of ten years I relocated my family three times. I raised my children in Novi, MI, then Cheshire, CT, before settling in Troy, MI. All three cities were upscale with excellent schools and well-educated people. Contrast this with Detroit and surrounding blue collar communities, and it’s not unlike Cheshire, an oasis in the desert. We were fortunate.

Our children grown and on their own, Tennessee became home. Having now lived in rural Tennessee, I better understand the significance of geographic poverty. It goes beyond financial wealth. It impacts communities’ visions, expectations and values. It influences what people talk about, where they place their emphasis, how they express their expectations for their futures. 

One gets a pretty clear picture of by an individual’s outlook by how he defines his locus of control. If a person has an internal locus of control, he sees himself in control of his destiny. He knows that whatever happens, he was the one that achieved or failed -- his way.

With an external locus of control, the person feels that everything that happens in his life was a function of outside forces. He accepts responsibility for nothing. “I’m in this fix because they didn’t..(fill in the blanks).” “My homework was lost because my dog pissed on my computer.” “I can’t make it to class at 1:00 p.m. because my car battery’s dead (even though it’s only 9:00 a.m.)” 

While many kids see school as a way out, others see themselves locked in forever. In my days as a student, I and most of my peers took college track classes. Fewer rural Tennessee teens hold expectations beyond high school. Some limit their expectations  for economic reasons. Others, influenced by their families’ views on education, don’t see it as a path out. Rather, for them it’s more time in another prison.Their visions, familial and community, don’t include personal growth. A job will do -- any job. 

Knoxville, an oasis in the desert of East Tennessee, is an up and coming community. It has terrific political leadership and a welcoming atmosphere. The city appreciates everyone, including those who live a bit on the edge, like artists and creatives, LGBTs, and minorities. Like progressive communities in other states, Knoxville understands that inclusivity is the key to growth and prosperity.

Not all areas of the city are equal. South Knoxville and East Knoxville are noticeably less well off, to be sure, than West Knoxville. WIth solid, visionary and non-partisan leadership, however, they are not ignored by the City. If anything, the City is actively working to embrace the areas and raise living standards and quality of life for all. It will take time. For the moment, geographic poverty remains evident. Lower performing schools, higher crime rates characterize the landscape. Businesses along main traffic arteries have less eye appeal, and attract a different clientele. 

Geography has an affect on where jobs are located, the time it takes to get to and fro, and the means by which to get there. People in poorer communities find better work in the richer parts of town. The challenge is to get there, and leave in a timely fashion, in keeping with bus schedules. Time away from family must include transit time, and it can be measured in hours per day.

These issues came to the fore as I read about the 30 Million Word Gap*. In the article, authors Risley and Hart disclosed the gap in learning between the poor and those who are not. Children of the poor hear fewer words from birth to school age. As a result, they enter school some two years behind in language development. Most never catch up. Children of the poor are deprived of parental presence, love, encouragement and guidance by virtue both of the hours they work, and the hours spent in traffic.

Children of the poor are exposed for the most part to others who are also poor, with similar skill deficiencies. They lack exposure to so many things: human contact, words and word association, socialization and, yes, food. In the United States, 23% of school age children live under these conditions. Few politicians consider this a problem. At a recent town hall meeting in Dandridge (pop. 2800), state representative Jeremy Faison was asked about the 30% of his constituents who are poor. His reply, "I take care of mine. They should take care of theirs." Faison is not alone among Tennessee legislators. Tennessee is not alone, either. Of the states with the highest percentages of long-term unemployed, Tennessee is just one of seven whose Senators voted in D.C. not to extend unemployment checks.

Geographic differences amplify economic differences, the result being a huge portion of our nation left out of the running for the American dream.

A new geographic segregation is slowly and inexorably occurring, one that will disenfranchise ever larger numbers of Americans, even those who are yet holding on to a middle  class lifestyle. That segregation is the Super Zip Code.

This geographic element is the wedge that will separate the top ten percent of Americans the rest. In the process, we will become, as Irish Writer  George Bernard Shaw once wrote, “separated by a common language.” We will also be separated by vision and values, as expressed in words we all know, but whose meanings will differ so widely that we will never find common ground. 

Few people I speak with, almost all educated and many of them professionals, have  ever heard of Super Zip Codes, but they are real and they are increasing in number. They are emblematic of future divides within the nation.  


http://www.businessinsider.com/map-americas-super-elite-live-in-these-zip-codes-2013-12

Super Zip Codes are areas where the elite live, work and play. They are zip codes that abut each other as increasing home and land values have led to the emigration of the less affluent to make way for more who are ‘like us’.  The elite are young upwardly mobile professionals, married to other upwardly mobile professionals who want to live near others ‘like themselves’. Within these geographies one soon finds the best of everything -- the best schools for their children, the best restaurants, the best bars; the best churches, the best arts and cultural centers, the best... everything. A good description of this phenomenon is recorded in  

People living within the zip codes no longer have a need to travel outside the area, that can encompass square miles. The elite need not see the middle class, let alone the poor. Their children may never come into contact with children of lesser stature.

The implications of super zip codes are many, and they are staggering. First, in total the populations of super zip codes will never account for more than five percent of the US population. And, since they are self sustaining, the elite residents and their progeny will never encounter the 95-99%. Their visions of the world and their expectations of the world will be at odds with the balance of their fellow Americans. The phrase ‘Fellow Americans’ will take on a new meaning: People like ‘US’. As a friend of mine once said, “There ain’t no ‘We’ in ‘I’.”

The 95-99% may never meet the elite but their lives will be impacted by them, often to their detriment. We see it today, in tax breaks that favor them. In 2013, 53% of all government expenditures favored them. We see it today in the number of public services that are being privatized, to their benefit. We see it in the way banks and financial institutions whose collapsing private ventures took public monies to save themselves, leaving the ‘others’ to fend for themselves.  

People in different worlds behave differently. The French behave nothing like the British, who have very little in common with the Chinese, or various nations in Africa. Likewise, people in different parts of a state experience life differently, as do people is adjoining neighborhoods. People in Bean Station, TN, have little in common with adjacent Morristown,  and even less in common with Tennesseans in Knoxville.


So it has always been among Americans within America, proving the adage ‘The United States is not united’.   




Grade Comparisons:






Super Zip Codes